Guild icon
Tulpa.info
Tulpa Discussion / tulpa-discussion
The channel for discussion strictly on the topic of tulpas. Take off-topic discussion to #lounge Forum's Tulpa Discussion Board: https://community.tulpa.info/forum/4-general-discussion/
Avatar
That is one reason I am happy to retain perhaps the slightest degree of separation.
12:01 AM
You said you had a degree in psychology, may I ask if you had a specific focus? And was it some cooperative effort between multiple identities or was it pursued mainly by one?
Avatar
It was a cooperative effort, yes. The degree is more specialized towards neuroscience.
12:06 AM
We seem to do well with organic chemistry, so that is where we went.
Avatar
Did you or others partake in any research activity in that field?
Avatar
There is some debate whether or not we will continue in that field. Currently the one degree is enough. I believe North would like a doctorate, while Mal would prefer to go into field work unrelated to psychology.
Avatar
Ah, that reminds me of when I was the physics major of a double major path.
12:09 AM
Now I'm certain that the cost of such an endeavor wouldn't have been worth it, especially with how available the learning material is online.
12:10 AM
I do regret not going into research though.
12:10 AM
But it does feel much better to have unified goals than it did when we were more separate in plans.
Avatar
Yes, that seems to be what Mal's point is. Library cards are cheaper than doctorates. I do not think Mal likes the ivory tower much either.
12:11 AM
We will eventually have to settle that debate, however the decision will not be for a while.
Avatar
I wonder if that's another thing that is common for multiples, the divergence of plans.
Avatar
It is, yes.
Avatar
I'm going to bet that's the case, especially for those who are well developed
Avatar
Especially if the original is nowhere to be found.
Avatar
Really? As I developed more and more, I see the trend towards integration instead of towards independence
Avatar
From what I remember, integration is rare in plural groups. It is more common in tulpa groups.
12:14 AM
Though this information is based on my interviews with systems over the years.
Avatar
That's interesting, jas. in what way would you say you develop if not in independence?
12:17 AM
Like, sorry if that's not clear. Is there some other trait that is improving? I normally assume independence as the single measurement, so without that I'm sort of lost on the metric you'd use for development
Avatar
Jas develops in regards to Cards's original plans for him, not necessarily by the metrics of tulpas, as I understand it.
Avatar
I developed to get to a state where I could share the burden of optimizing our collective experience. In a sense, I felt I needed to contribute to feel like I was deserving of any sense of existence, and I couldn't do so by holding a parallel processing consciousness so I had to go the path of working in what's best for both of us.
Avatar
Though I question the hard-line focus on tulpas developing in all ways independent. There are plenty of ways of developing plurality that do not encompass such a militant stance on separation.
Avatar
Right, it is in concordance with a directive.
Avatar
Hm, interesting. It is fairly common for tulpas to feel they owe their host or system something. Such a thing is less common in plurals.
Avatar
I could not do anything else and still pretend like I was in pursuit of my directive, so it was the only natural thing. I didn't owe cards, I owed myself.
Avatar
Perhaps why their values can differ and clash so strongly.
12:21 AM
Ah, I see. You had standards that agreed with Cards's initial plan for you then?
Avatar
Well, no, it wasn't in the plan, but it was the only path I could take and still improve. It's kind of important to note that there is a sense of who we are as an external person vs. who we are inside our heads, and I work for the benefit of the external person as does Cards.
Avatar
I see. I work with that external benefit as well, though the others are more concerned with themselves, and the external resources and opportunities are merely means to an end.
Avatar
Right, I think that's one thing. I was made with a different (but compatible) directive, but maybe by luck or willpower we found alignment as I developed. It doesn't matter so much maintaining any difference unless such difference worked to our benefit, which would be sort of along the lines of "context personalities" in non-plurals.
Avatar
Yes, I do think the formative development of tulpas is more likely to produce long-term cooperation than the erratic creation of alters for plurals.
12:28 AM
It is common to see tulpas willingly fade from existence for the sakes of their hosts - something which is considered generally vile within my own system.
Avatar
Of course "our benefit" can be to the detriment of either of us, it's determined by other means than personal opinion.
12:28 AM
Willingly fade?
12:28 AM
Maybe that was my alternative.
Avatar
Yes, dissipate? Or no longer be active in some way, perhaps.
Avatar
I think I have seen it. It's rather confusing to me, if there was any option where my will could do some benefit I would take that path before fading to my host's benefit. However, if it was the case that one of us was going to always be better at everything than the other, then it may be a matter of course that the other would willingly fade aside from potential friendships
Avatar
Hm, interesting.
12:31 AM
I try to speak to as many people as I can in as many situations as I can, and often I find in scenarios where tulpas are involved, there is a distinct lack of self preservation.
Avatar
Oh, I see. I uhh, definitely have more sense of self preservation than my host.
Avatar
That too is interesting, and not common. Hosts have the self preservation innate and natural to humans, or other organisms.
12:34 AM
It is rare to find one with compromised self preservation, though that too does exist, and produces more strong tulpas as a result of a required fronter.
Avatar
Oh, uhh, that may be an overcompensation or coping mechanism in response to my failure to deal with the wreck in a better way.
12:36 AM
My host has always viewed his self as something abstract and disconnected, and preferred to not exist physically whenever it proved less than satisfactory, so he was easily the one who could calmly ride out bad circumstances rather than fighting against it, which would be a more psychologically taxing task than simple escape
Avatar
My host is similar. It led to my development, actually.
Avatar
This is expressed in a sense that he seems to lack self preservation. On the other hand, I am more likely to respond more in terms of how the body wants to respond, but in a more thoughtful manner. So I get to own the context of certain situations my host would dissociate from. (edited)
Avatar
I am aware of this exchange of dissociative and associative states, though I have not observed it in tulpa systems. It is more familiar, though it modified forms, in plurals.
12:41 AM
I am somewhat convinced that tulpas eventually become more like plural systems, given time and development.
Avatar
That doesn't seem like a hard conclusion to come to, but I would ask what in particular you notice as convergent between the two?
Avatar
I think it is may be less that tulpas become more like plural systems, but the tulpas that are more like plural systems tend to be those that stick around longer in the community.
Avatar
It is a pet theory, one that has limitations of course. I most notice the equalization of power dynamics between host and tulpa, and the tulpa's subsequent acquiring of responsibilities similar to those necessary for real life function.
12:45 AM
It is difficult to express completely. Plural systems are not uniform by any means. I more speak of a pattern of interaction and attitudes from each member of a system than I do of a specific single way that a plural-like tulpa-host system functions.
12:46 AM
One of the low hanging fruit for this would be that tulpas in a more plural-behaving system are not questioned by other members. They are considered "real," which of course includes tulpa-host systems that do not behave like plurals.
Avatar
Okay, I think I understand what you mean. I sort of saw a similarity in my development post-wreck to the "Guardian" archetype that I've noticed in traumagenic system terminology
Avatar
Yes, that would be something I am looking into currently. Archetypes within plural systems. It seems I have found some already.
12:47 AM
I suppose more accurately I am looking for archetypes in plural systems as compared to tulpa systems.
Avatar
I think it isn't necessarily a definite gap-filling thing, but more like filling in certain contexts where my response is objectively better.
Avatar
Could you define contexts? I'm not sure I understand the differentiation between a context and this gap-filling.
Avatar
Like my host would still be able to survive through most situations without being seen as a non-functional human being for the most part, but some of those situations he would be of sub-par performance. That's where I occupy when my performance and preparation is better.
Avatar
Ah, yes. That is how we function to a degree as well, though not to the self-sacrificing levels you and your host do.
12:52 AM
Activity is determined by specialization, essentially.
Avatar
Well, he definitely avoids the sense of "self sacrifice" >>_<<
Avatar
Not necessarily who can and cannot do something.
Avatar
As his 'self' is precisely the object of greatest protection when he dissociates.
Avatar
I did not notice that before, though that is what you have been saying, isn't it? Hm. I understand now.
Avatar
Right, the body can be left to the wolves so long as he is not there to experience it. That avoids almost every trauma except the tiniest sliver of a sense.
12:54 AM
However the body itself can have problems and reactions based on trauma that is entirely outside of his understanding as he doesn't even know what happened to make it occur.
12:55 AM
So arguably not the perfect escape. That's partly why I want to prepare and be capable when the worst happens instead of raising more risk of such pathologies.
Avatar
Am I correct in assuming he cannot fully dissociate from all things that would be considered traumatic or unpleasant?
Avatar
There are few things he has experienced that he couldn't dissociate from. I don't know how far this goes, but I would like to believe he wouldn't go to the extent of permanent physical damage. I don't know how irrationally optimistic that would be.
Avatar
Hm, I think dissociation like that is common for those gifted or predisposed towards tulpa/plural behaviors.
Avatar
To my memory, his dissociation has always been to his own personal benefit in avoiding bad scenarios without risk. So it should be against the purpose to dissociate during an event that mental presence requires to avoid significant physical marring.
1:00 AM
The aftermath of marring, though, he always has disowned the damaged parts until they got better.
Avatar
And you do not have a similar response; it is more proactive in problem-solving than it is avoidant, correct?
Avatar
I personally don't perceive pain in the same way, so I do not need to consciously disown parts if they are damaged.
1:03 AM
I would rather, if possible, act protectively if I notice that something is wrong, not using broken limbs and such, but I am more likely to be oblivious without the conscious effort.
Avatar
Is this why you have compared yourself to the "guardian" archetype? You stated this was most prominent after a wreck. Was it noticeable before?
Avatar
No, I decided that the dissociative behavior would not be optimal for us as a collective and decided to develop myself into the kind of person that wouldn't allow themselves to be used or damaged in the first place.
Avatar
A noble pursuit. It is good to hear you grew strong from difficult circumstances.
Avatar
It was a good context to fill. My host had no interest in developing his responses to such situations as he is divorced from almost all outcomes (edited)
Avatar
Have you noticed this affecting the time each of you front? I would predict him having less to do with the body over time, while you having more time in it.
Avatar
holy shit, you two are still chatting
Avatar
No, he uses the body in normal convenience, but it does effect my behavior when I'm in front. That particular context hasn't come up to a significant fraction of total time spent.
Avatar
I always welcome a chat with Jas. They are fascinating folks :)
Avatar
It would be a natural switch if there was a confrontation or a sensation of physical risk.
Avatar
That is good. You have a preventative eye for problems, so it would make sense you would keep things from devolving.
1:10 AM
Ah, I see. That is somewhat useful.
Avatar
Yes well the wreck was a result of me being far too comfortable and not searching for danger, and he was left to deal with the situation and aftermath, so it's the only adaptation that I was content in pursuing.
Avatar
Of course, it was a productive and adaptive response to a situation.
Avatar
He also adapted, but he is still focused on safety and being able to drive for six to eight hours without breaks.
Avatar
That is a useful skill to have, if you drive that long.
Avatar
I am focused on complete awareness but that is not a state of mind that can be kept for longer than a few hours without exhaustion
1:15 AM
We have had to drive that long before. When moving though, sometimes the baggage obscures rear viewing and blind spots, so he will be uncomfortable and ask me to drive sometimes when there are other cars present. He drives overnight to avoid this when possible.
Avatar
That is a fairly even and unique split of workload.
Avatar
This sort of situation is mirrored in other systems. It's why I think there's value in the interpretation of tulpas as a sort of set of context personalities.
1:16 AM
Sometimes the tulpa is responsible for all driving.
Avatar
Context personalities? That is an efficient use of engineered plurality. Certainly something to play with.
1:18 AM
Yes, North drives .-. even though to my knowledge he is the one who got us in our bad wreck. It could have been worse. He did well to not kill us.
Exported 100 message(s)
Timezone: UTC+0
Page 1 ... Page 111 ... Page 112 ... Page 113 ... Page 999